اختبارات اداء كرت الشاشة GTS 450 مع المعالج Core i7-975 باستخدام اعدادات جودة فائقة

تعد سلسلة GTS 450 أكثر ملاءمةً لأجهزة الكمبيوتر المخصصة للميزانية والألعاب الأقل تطلبًا. مع ذاكرة MB 1024 الحالية، يمكن أن تتأثر بطاقة GTS 450 بانخفاض في الأداء يتعلق بالذاكرة في الألعاب الحديثة. يؤدي هذا الجمع بين GTS 450 و Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz إلى هبوط الأداء بنسبةأقل من 8٪ في بعض الألعاب وهو مثالي تمامًا لتجنب أي خسارة في سرعة عرض الاطارات في الثانية. يعد هذا المزيج بين GTS 450 و Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz مثالي لتجنب فقدان الأداء.

اختبارات اداء كرت الشاشة GTS 450 مع المعالج Core i7-975  باستخدام اعدادات جودة فائقة
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
السعر ﷼ 483.8
السنة 2010
أعلى درجة حرارة تم قياسها 73C
صوت المروحة 40.3dB
أفضل مزود طاقة 456W
المعالج المستخدم في اختبار الاداء Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz ($179.99)
تأثير المعالج على الاداء + 0.0 FPS
تأثير المعالج على الأداء % 0.0%
اعدادات الجودة المستخدمة Ultra Quality Settings
متوسط الأداء بدقة 1080p 18.9 FPS
متوسط الأداء بدقة 1440p 7.7 FPS
متوسط الأداء بدقة 4K 5.0 FPS
الذاكرة 1 GB
تكلفة 1080p لكل إطار ﷼ 25.6
1440p التكلفة لكل إطار ﷼ 62.8
تكلفة 4K لكل إطار ﷼ 96.8
المودل GTS 450
التقييم الاجمالي للجهاز 54/100 مقبول

اداء الألعاب مع اعدادات جودة فائقة

تغيير اعدادات الجودة

دقة الشاشة 1920x1080

السنة اللعبة اطار في الثانية
2019 Apex Legends
9.0 FPS
2019 Anthem
5.8 FPS
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
8.5 FPS
2019 Resident Evil 2
13.2 FPS
2019 Metro Exodus
5.9 FPS
2018 Just Cause 4
8.5 FPS
2018 Monster Hunter: World
9.2 FPS
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
11.8 FPS
2017 For Honor
15.7 FPS
2017 Project CARS 2
11.1 FPS
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
13.5 FPS
2016 Dishonored 2
8.1 FPS
2015 Rocket League
45.8 FPS
2015 Need For Speed
12.7 FPS
2015 Project CARS
12.2 FPS
2013 Bioshock Infinite
28.8 FPS
2013 GRID 2
51.4 FPS
2013 Total War: Rome 2
43.2 FPS
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
31.4 FPS
2011 Portal 2
64.3 FPS
2009 League of Legends
59.0 FPS
2008 Crysis: Warhead
25.9 FPS

دقة الشاشة 2560x1440

السنة اللعبة اطار في الثانية
2019 Apex Legends
6.7 FPS
2019 Anthem
4.6 FPS
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
6.6 FPS
2019 Resident Evil 2
8.9 FPS
2019 Metro Exodus
4.6 FPS
2018 Just Cause 4
6.3 FPS
2018 Monster Hunter: World
6.4 FPS
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
8.5 FPS
2017 For Honor
9.2 FPS
2017 Project CARS 2
7.9 FPS
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
12.2 FPS
2016 Dishonored 2
6.9 FPS
2015 Rocket League
19.7 FPS
2015 Need For Speed
9.8 FPS
2015 Project CARS
9.3 FPS
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
26.2 FPS
2009 League of Legends
32.7 FPS

دقة الشاشة 3840x2160

السنة اللعبة اطار في الثانية
2019 Apex Legends
4.0 FPS
2019 Anthem
2.5 FPS
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
3.5 FPS
2019 Resident Evil 2
4.4 FPS
2019 Metro Exodus
2.9 FPS
2018 Just Cause 4
3.3 FPS
2018 Monster Hunter: World
3.1 FPS
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
5.9 FPS
2017 For Honor
4.6 FPS
2017 Project CARS 2
6.6 FPS
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
10.2 FPS
2016 Dishonored 2
5.5 FPS
2015 Rocket League
9.2 FPS
2015 Need For Speed
6.6 FPS
2015 Project CARS
6.6 FPS
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
23.6 FPS
2009 League of Legends
13.1 FPS

مواصفات GTS 450

GTS 450 Board Design

Board NumberP1060
Length8.25 inches 210 mm
Outputs2x DVI1x mini-HDMI
Power Connectors1x 6-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP106 W

GTS 450 Clock Speeds

GPU Clock783 MHz
Memory Clock902 MHz 3608 MHz effective
Shader Clock1566 MHz

GTS 450 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16
GenerationGeForce 400
Launch Price129 USD
ProductionEnd-of-life
Release DateSep 13th, 2010

GTS 450 Graphics Features

CUDA2.1
DirectX12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL1.1
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model5.1
VulkanN/A

GTS 450 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureFermi
Die Size238 mm²
GPU NameGF106
GPU VariantGF106-250-KA-A1
Process Size40 nm
Transistors1,170 million

GTS 450 Memory

Bandwidth57.73 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit
Memory Size1024 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5

GTS 450 Render Config

ROPs16
SM Count4
Shading Units192
TMUs32

GTS 450 Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance601.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance50.11 GFLOPS (1:12)
Pixel Rate6.264 GPixel/s
Texture Rate25.06 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

Performance Summary: NVIDIA’s new GeForce GTS 450 is decent performer overall. In our testing, the reference GeForce GTS 450 typically performed about on-par with or somewhat lower than the ...
NVIDIA plans to change that today with the release of the new GeForce GTS 450. As the GTS moniker denotes, the GeForce GTS 450 is targeted at the mainstream market.
Conclusion. So here’s the deal. For the most part, Nvidia’s GeForce GTS 450 does what the company says it’s supposed to. It generally lands in between the Radeon HD 5770 and 5750 performance ...
The big problem for the Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 is the fact the HD 5770 is still on the market for the same price, and that last-gen DirectX11 GPU is still one of the best budget cards around.
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 Review. Written by bit-tech Staff ... Conclusion Stock models of the GTS 450 are set to launch at £110, with overclocked cards costing upwards of £135. This pitches the ...
¹ GeForce GTS 450 has more than 2 times faster FPS versus Radeon HD 5750 in Microsoft DirectX 11 SDK subd11 tessellation test with maximum tessellation level set. ² StarCraft performance measured on GeForce GTS 450 vs. Radeon HD 5750 at 16x10 4xAA/16xAF.
At the heart of the GTS 450 is the GF106 GPU, which is probably not one of NVIDIA’s best-kept secrets. Traditionally GPUs launch in desktop products first before getting the mobile treatment ...
2 Performance do StarCraft medida no GeForce GTS 450 vs. Radeon HD 5750 a 16x10 4xAA/16xAF. Suporte ao Microsoft DirectX 11 GPU DirectX 11 com suporte a Shader Model 5.0, projetada para performance ultrarrápida no novo recurso gráfico da API e tesselação acelerada por GPU.
The GTS 450 is the most basic Fermi GPU yet, with only one GPC (Graphics Processing Cluster) comprising four SMs (Streaming Multiprocessors) – think of it as essentially half of a GTX 460, which ...
Today NVIDIA released their new GeForce GTS 450. We take two of these cards for a spin and check whether SLI is an option worth pursuing. In addition to testing at the reference design clocks we also test at 875/1000 which represents two factory overclocked cards in SLI.

مناقشة وتعليقات

شارك تعليقاتك