اختبارات اداء كرت الشاشة RX Vega 64 مع المعالج i7-7700K باستخدام اعدادات جودة فائقة

من الجدير بالذكر أن هي بطاقة تحتاج إلى طاقة أكثر من غيرها، وتتطلب وحدة إمدادات طاقة لائقة. من حيث الذاكرة، فإن ذاكرة MB 8192 أكثر من كافية للألعاب الحديثة ويجب ألا تسبب أي انخفاض في الأداء. من المهم معرفة أن درجة الحرارة القصوى لكرت RX Vega 64 تعتبر عالية جدًا وقد تتطلب حلول تبريد متخصصة. باختصار، الأداء استثنائي، وليس هناك شك في أن هذا هو واحد من أقوى كروت الشاشة ومعالجة الرسومات في العام 2017 .

اختبارات اداء كرت الشاشة RX Vega 64 مع المعالج i7-7700K باستخدام اعدادات جودة فائقة
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
السعر ﷼ 1,571.3
السنة 2017
أعلى درجة حرارة تم قياسها 86C
صوت المروحة 56.3dB
أفضل مزود طاقة 645W
المعالج المستخدم في اختبار الاداء Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99)
تأثير المعالج على الاداء + 0.0 FPS
تأثير المعالج على الأداء % 0.0%
اعدادات الجودة المستخدمة Ultra Quality Settings
متوسط الأداء بدقة 1080p 107.6 FPS
متوسط الأداء بدقة 1440p 80.2 FPS
متوسط الأداء بدقة 4K 47.1 FPS
الذاكرة 8 GB
تكلفة 1080p لكل إطار ﷼ 17.4
1440p التكلفة لكل إطار ﷼ 23.3
تكلفة 4K لكل إطار ﷼ 39.7
المودل RX Vega 64
التقييم الاجمالي للجهاز 79/100 جيد جدا

اداء الألعاب مع اعدادات جودة فائقة

تغيير اعدادات الجودة

دقة الشاشة 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
السنة اللعبة اطار في الثانية
2019 Apex Legends
107
119.0
2019 Anthem
62
69.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
91
102.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
113
125.7
2019 Metro Exodus
50
56.0
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
121
135.0
2018 F1 2018
117
130.2
2018 Far Cry 5
95
106.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
51
57.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
69
77.4
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
81
90.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
81
91.0
2018 Fallout 76
121
134.8
2018 Hitman 2
94
105.0
2018 Just Cause 4
72
80.9
2018 Monster Hunter: World
78
87.1
2018 Battlefield V
112
125.0
2017 Dawn of War III
99
110.3
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
58
65.3
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
49
55.0
2017 Shadow of War
93
104.0
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
69
77.3
2017 Wolfenstein II
153
170.2
2017 Destiny 2
116
129.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
65
73.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
82
91.7
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
100
112.0
2017 For Honor
134
149.4
2017 Project CARS 2
95
105.8
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
115
128.2
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
74
82.7
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
77
85.7
2016 Doom
169
188.5
2016 F1 2016
94
105.4
2016 Total War: Warhammer
91
101.6
2016 Battlefield 1
126
140.9
2016 Overwatch
127
142.1
2016 Dishonored 2
69
77.2
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
75
83.7
2015 Rocket League
392
435.8
2015 Need For Speed
108
120.8
2015 Project CARS
104
115.8
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
190
211.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
268
298.8
2009 League of Legends
504
560.2

دقة الشاشة 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
السنة اللعبة اطار في الثانية
2019 Apex Legends
72
90.0
2019 Anthem
44
55.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
63
79.2
2019 Resident Evil 2
67
84.7
2019 Metro Exodus
34
43.6
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
70
88.0
2018 F1 2018
80
101.1
2018 Far Cry 5
67
84.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
34
43.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
44
55.8
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
48
61.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
61
77.0
2018 Fallout 76
77
97.0
2018 Hitman 2
55
69.0
2018 Just Cause 4
47
59.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
48
61.0
2018 Battlefield V
76
95.0
2017 Dawn of War III
72
91.2
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
47
59.2
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
42
53.0
2017 Shadow of War
56
70.9
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
45
57.3
2017 Wolfenstein II
94
117.7
2017 Destiny 2
88
110.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
44
56.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
47
59.5
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
64
80.9
2017 For Honor
69
87.1
2017 Project CARS 2
59
74.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
92
115.8
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
45
56.4
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
57
71.6
2016 Doom
111
139.1
2016 F1 2016
78
98.0
2016 Total War: Warhammer
62
77.7
2016 Battlefield 1
86
107.7
2016 Overwatch
78
98.0
2016 Dishonored 2
52
66.0
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
47
59.4
2015 Rocket League
149
186.8
2015 Need For Speed
74
93.4
2015 Project CARS
70
88.4
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
109
137.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
199
249.0
2009 League of Legends
248
311.2

دقة الشاشة 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
السنة اللعبة اطار في الثانية
2019 Apex Legends
33
48.0
2019 Anthem
21
30.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
29
42.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
29
41.7
2019 Metro Exodus
19
27.4
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
26
38.0
2018 F1 2018
42
61.0
2018 Far Cry 5
31
45.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
21
30.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
21
31.1
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
21
31.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
35
51.0
2018 Fallout 76
37
53.0
2018 Hitman 2
28
40.0
2018 Just Cause 4
21
31.1
2018 Monster Hunter: World
20
29.3
2018 Battlefield V
37
53.0
2017 Dawn of War III
35
50.5
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
27
38.6
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
23
34.0
2017 Shadow of War
29
42.1
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
20
29.2
2017 Wolfenstein II
48
69.4
2017 Destiny 2
38
55.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
22
32.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
22
32.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
39
56.0
2017 For Honor
30
43.6
2017 Project CARS 2
43
62.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
67
97.1
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
21
30.4
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
41
59.2
2016 Doom
51
73.4
2016 F1 2016
45
64.6
2016 Total War: Warhammer
31
45.3
2016 Battlefield 1
41
59.0
2016 Overwatch
35
50.4
2016 Dishonored 2
36
52.3
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
21
31.1
2015 Rocket League
60
87.1
2015 Need For Speed
43
62.2
2015 Project CARS
43
62.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
44
63.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
156
224.1
2009 League of Legends
87
124.5

مواصفات RX Vega 64

RX Vega 64 Board Design

Board NumberD05001
Length11 inches 279 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP295 W

RX Vega 64 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1536 MHz
GPU Clock1200 MHz
Memory Clock945 MHz 1890 MHz effective

RX Vega 64 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVega (RX Vega)
Launch Price499 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateAug 7th, 2017

RX Vega 64 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.1
Vulkan1.1.82

RX Vega 64 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 5.0
Die Size510 mm²
GPU NameVega 10
GPU VariantVega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Process Size14 nm
Transistors12,500 million

RX Vega 64 Memory

Bandwidth483.8 GB/s
Memory Bus2048 bit
Memory Size8192 MB
Memory TypeHBM2

RX Vega 64 Render Config

Compute Units64
ROPs64
Shading Units4096
TMUs256

RX Vega 64 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance25,166 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance12,583 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance786.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate98.30 GPixel/s
Texture Rate393.2 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

• See the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at Best Buy The Verdict If this were two separate reviews the Vega 56 would get a higher score than the Vega 64, but since it's one review I'm labeling both of ...
Conclusion. On the one hand, AMD's Radeon RX Vega cards get the company back into the ring against Nvidia, fighting in a higher GPU weight class. ... both the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and the Nvidia ...
Our AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 review confirms that the company achieved major performance improvements over their last-generation Polaris and Fiji cards: Vega is faster than the GTX 1080. We tested six different performance configurations of the Vega 64, with surprising results.
Conclusion (RX Vega 56) The Radeon RX Vega 56 is easily the best card of this launch. It is cooler, quieter, and more efficient than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and delivers only 10 percent less ...
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64: the Digital Foundry verdict The numbers don't lie. There's an RX Vega out there that offers great performance for the money and brings the fight to the competition, but it's ...
A better comparison for purchasing decisions would have been to use the RX Vega 64 Air Cooled, or to have compared the RX Vega 64 LC to the GTX 1080ti as the pricing is more in line.
Our Verdict. The Radeon RX Vega 64 is an excellent first showing of AMD’s newest graphics cards with Nvidia GTX 1080-equivalent performance and the potential of so much more.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 review AMD's top GPU is a fast but power-hungry beast.
Conclusion (RX Vega 64) The RX Vega 64 is an answer to the GTX 1080, but currently it's not a whole lot more than that, and it's not an especially great answer either.
After months of teases and delays, the wait for Vega is finally over. First, AMD launched its flagship Radeon RX 64 lineup: the 9 Radeon RX Vega 64 and the 9 liquid-cooled Radeon RX Vega 64 ...
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 preview. ... so thanks AMD! RX Vega vs. the World: a 15-round heavyweight battle ... The RX Vega 64 is available starting today. As discussed previously ...
Radeon RX Vega 64: At a Glance (Again) Speeds and feeds are always good to recap, so borrowing from our earlier coverage: Like the Radeon R9 Fury X's Fiji processor, Radeon RX Vega 64 employs four ...
AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64 requires a pair of eight-pin power connectors, and AMD's packaging says you'll need a 750-watt power supply, at minimum. Even if you don't care much about extra power ...
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is an excellent first showing of AMD’s newest graphics cards with Nvidia GTX 1080-equivalent performance and the potential of so much more. AMD Vega has been on the tip of ...
AMD’s current suggested retail price for its RX Vega 64 is 9 (£549, about AU0), but third party manufacturers, like Gigabyte and Asus, are still selling the card for far more than that on ...
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2017. Built on the 14 nm process, and based on the Vega 10 graphics processor, in its Vega 10 XT variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.

مناقشة وتعليقات

شارك تعليقاتك
R
robbriefcase 4 months ago
Should I buy RX VEGA 64 or GTX 1070???
Should I buy RX VEGA 64 or GTX 1070 if I have a chance to buy RX VEGA 64 for 350 euro (used, 3 months, only for gaming) and I can buy the GTX 1070 for 400 euro (used, 2 years, gaming).

Which one should I buy? I know that gtx 1070 is better at power usage, but it's used for already 2 years...

So please help me decide!!!
0 0
M
monsoonquirk 4 months ago
Providing you have a sufficient power supply to care for the RX Vega AND it hasn’t been used for mining, then I wouldn’t personally say go for the 64. It is a much more powerful card and currently by your prices cheaper than a 1070.

Especially with the Vega card been much newer and only been used for 3 months it is a much better option in my opinion.
0 0