اختبارات اداء كرت الشاشة R9 FURY مع المعالج i7-4790K باستخدام اعدادات جودة فائقة

في دقة 1440 بكسل ، يمكن لـ R9 FURY الوصول إلى معدل يتراوح من 50 إلى 60 إطارًا في الثانية لأغلب الألعاب تقريبًا بإعدادات فائقة الجودة - فقط دون تنعيم الحواف أو الأضاءة HBAO وبعض اعدادات الظل المتقدمة. من الجدير بالذكر أن هي بطاقة تحتاج إلى طاقة أكثر من غيرها، وتتطلب وحدة إمدادات طاقة لائقة. مع ذاكرة RAM 4096 الحالية، يمكن أن تحتوي السلسلة R9 FURY على عدد قليل جدًا من الاختناقات المرتبطة بالذاكرة في الألعاب الحديثة.

اختبارات اداء كرت الشاشة R9 FURY مع المعالج i7-4790K باستخدام اعدادات جودة فائقة
AMD Radeon R9 FURY
السعر ﷼ 2,058.8
السنة 2015
أعلى درجة حرارة تم قياسها C
صوت المروحة dB
أفضل مزود طاقة 625W
المعالج المستخدم في اختبار الاداء Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz ($306.99)
تأثير المعالج على الاداء + 0.0 FPS
تأثير المعالج على الأداء % 0.0%
اعدادات الجودة المستخدمة Ultra Quality Settings
متوسط الأداء بدقة 1080p 72.5 FPS
متوسط الأداء بدقة 1440p 54.2 FPS
متوسط الأداء بدقة 4K 32.2 FPS
الذاكرة 4 GB
تكلفة 1080p لكل إطار ﷼ 28.4
1440p التكلفة لكل إطار ﷼ 38.0
تكلفة 4K لكل إطار ﷼ 63.9
المودل R9 FURY
التقييم الاجمالي للجهاز 68/100 جيد

والخبر السار هو أنه مع إصدار R9 FURY X ، فإن سعر R9 FURY يحصل على خصم أكبر. R9 FURY أغلى بكثير من R9 390 لأنه يكلف ضخم. قارن هذا بـ R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X ، الذي جاء أصلاً بسعر , . وفي الوقت نفسه ، فإن أقرب بطاقة تعادل NVIDIA هي GTX 980 التي تكلف .

لسوء الحظ ، لم يكن أداء الألعاب مثيراً للإعجاب. حتى إذا كان R9 FURY يسلم باستمرار زيادة معدل الإطارات على R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X ، فإن الربح لا يبرر الترقية. ما إذا كانت ترقية مبررة تعتمد على بطاقة الرسومات التي تقوم بالترقية منها. لن يشاهد المستخدمون الذين لديهم R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X زيادة ملحوظة في معدلات الإطارات بعد دفع المزيد مقابل R9 FURY . وبالمثل، فإن أولئك التمسك GTX 980 الصورة GTX 780 وبطاقات الرسومات يكن لديك سبب للقفز فرق حتى الان.

بالنسبة إلى 1080p Full HD ، تمكنا من لعب Final Fantasy XV, Far Cry New Dawn, Apex Legends, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 2 على 65 fps إلى 83 fps و احتفظت بمعدلات إطار تحوم حول 74 fps. بالنسبة إلى 1440p Quad HD ، تمكنا من لعب World War Z, Battlefield V, Fallout 76 على 66 fps إلى 72 fps و احتفظت بمعدلات إطار تحوم حول 68 fps.

اداء الألعاب مع اعدادات جودة فائقة

تغيير اعدادات الجودة

دقة الشاشة 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
السنة اللعبة اطار في الثانية
2019 Apex Legends
64
72.0
2019 Anthem
41
46.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
61
68.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
74
83.2
2019 Metro Exodus
33
37.1
2019 World War Z
81
91.0
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
76
85.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
34
38.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
58
65.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
45
51.0
2018 Just Cause 4
48
53.6
2018 Monster Hunter: World
51
57.7
2018 Battlefield V
74
83.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
49
55.0
2017 Destiny 2
94
105.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
66
74.2
2017 For Honor
89
98.9
2017 Project CARS 2
63
70.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
76
84.9
2016 Dishonored 2
45
51.1
2015 Rocket League
259
288.4
2015 Need For Speed
71
79.9
2015 Project CARS
68
76.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
126
140.1
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
178
197.8
2009 League of Legends
333
370.8

دقة الشاشة 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
السنة اللعبة اطار في الثانية
2019 Apex Legends
42
53.6
2019 Anthem
29
36.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
42
52.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
44
56.0
2019 Metro Exodus
23
28.8
2019 World War Z
53
66.4
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
40
50.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
24
30.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
36
46.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
28
36.0
2018 Fallout 76
57
72.0
2018 Just Cause 4
31
39.6
2018 Monster Hunter: World
32
40.4
2018 Battlefield V
53
67.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
35
44.0
2017 Destiny 2
72
90.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
42
53.6
2017 For Honor
46
57.7
2017 Project CARS 2
39
49.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
61
76.6
2016 Dishonored 2
34
43.7
2015 Rocket League
98
123.6
2015 Need For Speed
49
61.8
2015 Project CARS
46
58.5
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
72
90.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
131
164.8
2009 League of Legends
164
206.0

دقة الشاشة 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
السنة اللعبة اطار في الثانية
2019 Apex Legends
22
32.0
2019 Anthem
14
20.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
19
28.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
19
27.6
2019 Metro Exodus
12
18.1
2019 World War Z
26
38.2
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
23
34.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
14
21.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
18
27.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
12
18.0
2018 Fallout 76
28
40.0
2018 Just Cause 4
14
20.6
2018 Monster Hunter: World
13
19.4
2018 Battlefield V
18
26.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
19
28.0
2017 Destiny 2
31
45.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
25
37.1
2017 For Honor
20
28.8
2017 Project CARS 2
28
41.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
45
64.3
2016 Dishonored 2
24
34.6
2015 Rocket League
40
57.7
2015 Need For Speed
28
41.2
2015 Project CARS
28
41.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
29
42.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
103
148.3
2009 League of Legends
57
82.4
R9 FURY with i7-4790K at 1080p and جودة فائقة settings
R9 FURY with i7-4790K at 1440p and جودة فائقة settings
R9 FURY with i7-4790K at 4K and جودة فائقة settings

مواصفات R9 FURY

R9 FURY Board Design

Board NumberC88003
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP275 W

R9 FURY Clock Speeds

GPU Clock1000 MHz
Memory Clock500 MHz 1000 MHz effective

R9 FURY Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationPirate Islands (R9 300)
Launch Price549 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateJul 10th, 2015

R9 FURY Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model6
Vulkan1.1.82

R9 FURY Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 3.0
Die Size596 mm²
GPU NameFiji
GPU VariantFiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors8,900 million

R9 FURY Memory

Bandwidth512.0 GB/s
Memory Bus4096 bit
Memory Size4096 MB
Memory TypeHBM

R9 FURY Render Config

Compute Units56
ROPs64
Shading Units3584
TMUs224

R9 FURY Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance7,168 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance7,168 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance448.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate64.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate224.0 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

Conclusion. AMD is putting reviewers in a tough spot with Fury. On one hand, the Fiji GPU with HBM is a remarkable feat of engineering. HBM is only in its infancy, but the technology already shows ...
The AMD Radeon R9 Fury Nano is one of the most exciting graphics cards I’ve seen for years and, at only 6in long, it’s also one of the smallest. ... Verdict. AMD’s latest card is one of its ...
Conclusion: Fiji delivers, but also faces formidable competition. Unfortunately we are bringing you our Radeon R9 Fury X review a week late. AMD had limited samples ready for the release and only ...
Verdict. If AMD and Nvidia’s flagship cards are too expensive then the AMD Radeon R9 Fury is a good option for high-end gameplay. Be warned, though – its power consumption is high. ...
AMD Radeon R9 Fury: the Digital Foundry verdict If you're looking for the cheapest single-chip GPU that can run a good proportion of games well at 4K resolution, the Radeon R9 Fury is a quality ...
Last week, AMD lifted the veil in its Radeon R7 and R9 300 series of products and publicly demoed its latest flagship, the Radeon R9 Fury X, at a small venue adjacent to E3. While the Radeon R7 ...
The R9 Fury X's power consumption is a real achievement by AMD. Given what we had seen in the past by the Radeon R9 290X and R9 390X, we had just naturally assumed that the Fury X would use a lot ...
The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X also supports the Asynchronous Shader technology AMD talked about recently. Asynchronous Shaders are a feature of new or next-gen APIs like DirectX 12, Vulkan, and AMD’s ...
AMD's Radeon R9 Fury X is released today, introducing HBM memory for graphics cards. The new card is built around a watercooled Fiji GPU, which enabled AMD to design a very compact card that will fit into many small-form-factor cases. Gaming performance at 4K is good and roughly matches the GTX 980 Ti.
In our review of AMD’s Radeon R9 Fury, we discovered that the Fury X’s air-cooled sibling packs a performance punch that justifies its competitive price tag. In fact, it punishes Nvidia’s ...
Radeon R9 Fury X specs. The Fiji processor in the R9 Fury X is based on AMD's third generation GCN architecture, previously found in the R9 295/380, and codenamed Tonga.
While AMD introduced its highly anticipated Radeon R9 Fury X in June, we’re taking a deeper look at its power consumption and pump noise. Since we were able to procure our own retail board, we ...
The Fury X uses an all-new chunk of silicon dubbed Fiji, as opposed to the die in the Radeon R9 290X, which was called Hawaii. Fiji is the beefiest GPU AMD has ever crafted, and it sports a ...
AMD says the Fury X is a reference design only, though the air-cooled Radeon R9 Fury scheduled for a July 14 release will have vendor-customized designs available.
Catching up to the present, this month marks an important occasion for AMD with the launch of their new flagship GPU, Fiji, and the flagship video card based on it, the Radeon R9 Fury X.
AMD's Radeon R9 Fury X is released today, introducing HBM memory for graphics cards. The new card is built around a watercooled Fiji GPU, which enabled AMD to design a very compact card that will fit into many small-form-factor cases. Gaming performance at 4K is good and roughly matches the GTX 980 Ti.
A bit over two weeks ago AMD launched their new flagship video card, the Radeon R9 Fury X.Based on the company’s new Fiji GPU, the R9 Fury X brought with it significant performance improvements ...
AMD does find itself in a somewhat strange position, what with arming Radeon R9 390X and 390 with 8GB and all. Still, we just don’t think the flagship’s halved capacity is much of a handicap.
Reference AMD Radeon R9 Fury specs. ... Of course, as Fiji is AMD’s latest and greatest GPU, the Nitro R9 Fury also supports AMD’s latest and greatest software features, like FreeSync, Virtual ...

مناقشة وتعليقات

شارك تعليقاتك