اختبارات اداء كرت الشاشة R9 285 مع المعالج i7-4770K باستخدام اعدادات جودة فائقة

مع ذاكرة MB 2048 الحالية، يمكن أن تتأثر بطاقة R9 285 بانخفاض في الأداء يتعلق بالذاكرة في الألعاب الحديثة. يؤدي هذا الجمع بين R9 285 و Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz إلى هبوط الأداء بنسبةأقل من 8٪ في بعض الألعاب وهو مثالي تمامًا لتجنب أي خسارة في سرعة عرض الاطارات في الثانية. يعد هذا المزيج بين R9 285 و Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz مثالي لتجنب فقدان الأداء. مع ذاكرة RAM 2048 الحالية، يمكن أن تحتوي السلسلة R9 285 على عدد قليل جدًا من الاختناقات المرتبطة بالذاكرة في الألعاب الحديثة.

اختبارات اداء كرت الشاشة R9 285 مع المعالج i7-4770K باستخدام اعدادات جودة فائقة
AMD Radeon R9 285
السعر ﷼ 1,425.0
السنة 2014
أعلى درجة حرارة تم قياسها 70C
صوت المروحة 48.3dB
أفضل مزود طاقة 540W
المعالج المستخدم في اختبار الاداء Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz ($284.99)
تأثير المعالج على الاداء + 0.0 FPS
تأثير المعالج على الأداء % 0.0%
اعدادات الجودة المستخدمة Ultra Quality Settings
متوسط الأداء بدقة 1080p 41.9 FPS
متوسط الأداء بدقة 1440p 30.5 FPS
متوسط الأداء بدقة 4K 17.4 FPS
الذاكرة 2 GB
تكلفة 1080p لكل إطار ﷼ 22.3
1440p التكلفة لكل إطار ﷼ 30.6
تكلفة 4K لكل إطار ﷼ 53.7
المودل R9 285
التقييم الاجمالي للجهاز 57/100 مقبول

اداء الألعاب مع اعدادات جودة فائقة

تغيير اعدادات الجودة

دقة الشاشة 1920x1080

السنة اللعبة اطار في الثانية
2019 Apex Legends
36.0 FPS
2019 Anthem
23.2 FPS
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
34.0 FPS
2019 Resident Evil 2
47.1 FPS
2019 Metro Exodus
21.0 FPS
2018 Forza Horizon 4
32.0 FPS
2018 Fallout 76
36.0 FPS
2018 Hitman 2
28.0 FPS
2018 Just Cause 4
30.3 FPS
2018 Monster Hunter: World
32.6 FPS
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
48.0 FPS
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
31.5 FPS
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
41.9 FPS
2017 For Honor
55.9 FPS
2017 Project CARS 2
39.6 FPS
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
48.0 FPS
2016 Overwatch
49.0 FPS
2016 Dishonored 2
28.9 FPS
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
35.7 FPS
2015 Total War: Attila
32.1 FPS
2015 Rocket League
163.1 FPS
2015 Need For Speed
45.2 FPS
2015 Project CARS
43.3 FPS
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
74.2 FPS
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
52.0 FPS
2014 Far Cry 4
48.5 FPS
2014 GRID Autosport
69.2 FPS
2014 Shadow of Mordor
46.8 FPS
2014 The Talos Principle
60.3 FPS
2013 Crysis 3
40.6 FPS
2013 Battlefield 4
45.8 FPS
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
111.8 FPS
2009 League of Legends
209.7 FPS

دقة الشاشة 2560x1440

السنة اللعبة اطار في الثانية
2019 Apex Legends
26.8 FPS
2019 Anthem
18.4 FPS
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
26.4 FPS
2019 Resident Evil 2
31.7 FPS
2019 Metro Exodus
16.3 FPS
2018 Forza Horizon 4
27.0 FPS
2018 Hitman 2
18.0 FPS
2018 Just Cause 4
22.4 FPS
2018 Monster Hunter: World
22.8 FPS
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
37.0 FPS
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
20.3 FPS
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
30.3 FPS
2017 For Honor
32.6 FPS
2017 Project CARS 2
28.0 FPS
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
43.3 FPS
2016 Overwatch
33.6 FPS
2016 Dishonored 2
24.7 FPS
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
21.3 FPS
2015 Total War: Attila
21.3 FPS
2015 Rocket League
69.9 FPS
2015 Need For Speed
35.0 FPS
2015 Project CARS
33.1 FPS
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
55.7 FPS
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
34.3 FPS
2014 Far Cry 4
34.6 FPS
2014 GRID Autosport
50.4 FPS
2014 Shadow of Mordor
32.0 FPS
2014 The Talos Principle
42.9 FPS
2013 Crysis 3
34.7 FPS
2013 Battlefield 4
29.5 FPS
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
93.2 FPS
2009 League of Legends
116.5 FPS

دقة الشاشة 3840x2160

السنة اللعبة اطار في الثانية
2019 Apex Legends
16.0 FPS
2019 Anthem
10.0 FPS
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
14.0 FPS
2019 Resident Evil 2
15.6 FPS
2019 Metro Exodus
10.3 FPS
2018 Forza Horizon 4
18.0 FPS
2018 Hitman 2
11.0 FPS
2018 Just Cause 4
11.7 FPS
2018 Monster Hunter: World
11.0 FPS
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
21.0 FPS
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
11.2 FPS
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
21.0 FPS
2017 For Honor
16.3 FPS
2017 Project CARS 2
23.3 FPS
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
36.3 FPS
2016 Overwatch
17.5 FPS
2016 Dishonored 2
19.6 FPS
2015 Rocket League
32.6 FPS
2015 Need For Speed
23.3 FPS
2015 Project CARS
23.3 FPS
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
83.9 FPS
2009 League of Legends
46.6 FPS

مقارنة مع المنافسين

مواصفات R9 285

R9 285 Board Design

Board NumberC766
Length8.7 inches 221 mm
Outputs2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 6-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP190 W

R9 285 Clock Speeds

GPU Clock918 MHz
Memory Clock1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective

R9 285 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVolcanic Islands (R9 200)
Launch Price249 USD
ProductionEnd-of-life
Release DateSep 2nd, 2014

R9 285 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model6
Vulkan1.1.82

R9 285 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 3.0
Die Size366 mm²
GPU NameTonga
GPU VariantTonga PRO (215-0851128)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors5,000 million

R9 285 Memory

Bandwidth176.0 GB/s
Memory Bus256 bit
Memory Size2048 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 285 Render Config

Compute Units28
ROPs32
Shading Units1792
TMUs112

R9 285 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance3,290 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance3,290 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance205.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate29.38 GPixel/s
Texture Rate102.8 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

AMD's 9 Radeon R9 285 delivers modern features (such as support for TrueAudio and FreeSync) found on other AMD cards, and performance that edges out Nvidia's GeForce GTX 760.
AMD's 9 Radeon R9 285 delivers modern features (such as support for TrueAudio and FreeSync) found on other AMD cards, and performance that edges out Nvidia's GeForce GTX 760.
Having said that, the Radeon R9 285 is a wonderful option at 0 and probably represents the best product a gamer can buy for that price, just as the Radeon R9 280 did.
AMD’s reference specifications call for up to a 918MHz engine clock for the Radeon R9 285 with 1375MHz memory (5.5 Gbps effective). The specifications list 2GB of on-board memory, but 4GB ...
The R9 285 starts slightly behind the GTX 760 in Battlefield 4 and the R9 280 is also ahead by a few fps. The new card also only manages to be 1fps faster than the R9 270X at both resolutions tested.
AMD Radeon R9 285: Other Benchmarks Fire Strike is 3D Mark’s toughest graphics benchmark, and in this test the R9 285 scored 6,744 points. That’s better than the 5,905 scored by the R9 280 ...
The Radeon R9 285 is indeed a new piece of silicon, code-named "Tonga." What's newest about it: It brings with it the features of other recent AMD cards, such as TrueAudio and support for multi ...
Last month AMD held their 30 years of graphics celebration, during which they announced their next Radeon video card, the Radeon R9 285. Designed to be AMD’s new 9 midrange enthusiast card ...
The R9 280 debuted with an MSRP of 9 and this is the exact price point that the R9 285 is arriving at, placing it directly between the R9 270X (0) and R9 280X (0). Given their similar ...
On paper, the new Tonga-based R9 285 looks to be slightly slower than the R9 280 it is intended to replace, but there's more than meets the eye. When we first heard about the new Radeon R9 285 ...
AMD Radeon R9 285 Review: Feat. Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC ... Power, Temperature, & Noise. As always, last but not least is our look at power, temperature, and noise. Next to price and performance ...
AMD Radeon R9 285: Under the Hood. The R9 285 is the only card to currently use the Tonga core. It’s a mid-range core, but it shares a crucial part of its architecture with AMD’s high-end 290 ...

مناقشة وتعليقات

شارك تعليقاتك